Yeah I know what you mean with the past cause present effect. Once mine finds a bug anywhere in the house he will revisit the spot on and off for a month. Once he spotted a mouse which was short lived… he revisited that spot for 3 solid months and just planted himself there.

They like running water. Apparently there are water dishes for cats that provide this as a feature.

shelters are all full of cats and kittens across the area right now

how close are they to the restaurant? Would the person walking by foot have to have a vehicle to get the kitten to a shelter? Perhaps they haven’t transport. Perhaps they have a disability. Perhaps many reasons they can’t get to a shelter. If the shelter is right beside the restaurant, then yeah, the person wasn’t thinking. If not, they were probably trying to get kitten safe immediately especially if it’s wet and the restaurant could be the closest warm building to where the kitten was found. Not ideal but it is a possible scenario.

I’m glad either way the end result was she found a new home. Just hopefully we don’t have to assume malice is around every corner with other fellow humans.

Exactly. In all likeliness the restaurant was probably the closest open (warm) building in the area the kitten was found.

First option probably just leave kitty in wherever it was and let it die. At least this way it has found a home. I think leaving the kitty to die would have been comparatively worse in the scenario we’re talking about.

I can’t believe some people.

we don’t know backstory there. We don’t know if a human is at fault at all. possible a kitten got separated from the litter especially at that age. it could be a kitten from a stray with no human involvement at all.

A person walking by might not have the space or even has a severe allergy to cats so they took it immediately to the closest spot so the kitten wouldn’t die. This is Just a hunch like any other. It’s just that malice may not always be the back story. Some(one) isn’t always just someone who just won’t but can’t and isn’t even directly responsible for it. For all we now the person dropping it off could be an asshole or someone doing a kindness in and of itself to save a kitten even in a small way.

Assuming the worst serves nothing and it’s not a healthy way to expend your energy and it just polarizes with assumptions against the humans around us without basis and that’s a pretty unfair way to go at other likely innocent people.

Yes it’s funny how we assign a hairstyle to region

Memes like this make me glad I only usd Linux at work. You don’t get this petty micromanaging shit between windows users.

Now this is how you journal. Proper, succinct, on-point sentences that tell the story as it actually is.

Been there omg I still have fantasies of being back there.

I like just ‘feed’ the beast.

Fatten sounds like it’s chonking. And that is animal abuse

I can’t believe how much more money such a faulty feature costs too.

deleted by creator

Right because misusing a fucking pathetic phrase that seems to be your hill to die on is the real take away here. Not the rampant toxic masculinity getting slipped under the radar.

You. You and your fucked up syntax fucking thinking like this are the problem with everything that’s gone wrong with the big picture items. You don’t give a shit about anyone but your little pet peeves. You just proved that you bring nothing to any table ever and do not ever intend to you impotent little narcissist.

-Said the abuser. When Grabbing towels and pinching penises in the boys locker room shit gets defended as ‘rough housing’ you sick fuck.

Especially considering the era in which ‘rough housing’ was coined. Layers of old, stale toxicity there, gramps.

Mmk. Go back to flushing your toilet, picking food off of a shelf, typing on your device to a whole planet, leaving your garbage at the curb and benefiting from medical science like all the rest of the chimpanzees then.

Rough housing/mucking are container words. Blanket terms that can contain anything including dismissed sexual assault and other poor behaviour that influence children. This is the whole point of why umbrella terms like ‘boys will be boys’ is bad. It helps brush over the plethora of problems inside of these containers instead of address them directly.

The system is still broken. Expecting one or two to fight against a broken system just to prove one cop is good is hardly an argument for cops supporting a system that only rewards corruption. It’s not about giving medals and a pat on a head. It’s about reform.

So long as they benefit from supporting a bad system: they are bad.

Calling out misinformation meant to prey on customers…you’re not being pedantic. You’re doing us a favor here.

It does exist in the way that chocolate ‘solids’ exist as an element of chocolate. A typical chocolate bar consists of both chocolate solids and cocoa butter. It’s still an element of what you’re eating,

So just cuz you eat ‘chocolate’ because you think you only favor the solids, you’re still eating the butter too in what makes chocolate. It’s like drinking milk products and then getting pedantic over people who use butter as a food even though milk contains some the same elements.

But again this is about stupid hills to die on. And you picked an intolerant and ignorant stance so I guess you technically win in this particular topic.