Oh noez! Anyway…

  • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’m sorry, do you genuinely think that burning some random guy’s car is actual retaliation?

    You really underestimate how many people buy above their means for cars.

    • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I’m sorry, do you genuinely think that burning some random guy’s car is actual retaliation?

      When that car has become a symbol, definitely. The car being burnt isn’t random after all.

      Otherwise your statement has the same energy as saying we shouldn’t burn some random guy’s work uniform. It omits that this is the uniform:

      You really underestimate how many people buy above their means for cars.

      As far as I’ve seen, most Teslas being scorched are dealership ones, not personal ones. But even if it were a personal one, isn’t insurance mandatory in the USA? Probably would get a bigger payout if someone did torch it rather than trading in at a dealership. And would definitely probably get more out of it than if it were just keyed and the tires were punctured. Bonus, one less swatsicar in circulation.

      • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        When that car has become a symbol, definitely. The car being burnt isn’t random after all.

        It is some random man’s car still. I didn’t say it was a random car. And likely someone who hates trump too, since they’re driving electric

        Thw car wasn’t a symbol when they bought it

        Bonus, one less swatsicar in circulation

        One less electric car. You want to actively destroy the environment to own the conservatives. Not passively. Actively.

        Also no, coverage for your own car is not mandatory, what?