• nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        $600 gets you 16GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. You can get better hardware for less.

        • kibiz0r@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Is there even a better ARM SoC? All I know of is the Snapdragon X Elites, which are either on par or slightly below the M4. And you can only get them in a laptop form factor at this point, cuz they cancelled the mini-PC dev kit.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      When… have their products ever been competitive on price? Not even shitting on them, but there’s always been an Apple tax.

      • 4z01235@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Back in 2009-2010 I bought an entry level 13" MacBook Pro because it was fairly competitively priced compared to other options with similar specs, but the MBP had by far the better battery life, display quality, touchpad, and probably keyboard. It was easily worth the upcharge for those factors, so no real Apple Tax.

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Honestly, now that they put in a reasonable amount of RAM, with a processor that strong and some external storage, 600USD isn’t that terrible of a price.

        • jqubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          I’d need to see what comparable x86 processors and graphics are to the M4, but yeah, this seems like it could be one of the first Macs in a while to be really competitive on price. It doesn’t happen often but it does happen. Fifteen years ago, a couple years after Macintosh went to Intel, I bought a Mac Pro. I had a hard time comparing prices at first, but once I finally realized I needed to be looking at workstations instead of desktops the Mac Pro actually came out to be about $300 less than identically spec’d workstations from Dell and HP. That was about the price of a full retail license on Windows Vista Ultimate (or later Windows 7 Ultimate). With Boot Camp and feeling like I could find Windows on sale for less it actually seemed to make the most sense with the added benefit of access to both Windows and OS X. It was frankly the best Windows machine I’ve ever used. No bloat, and all the drivers worked.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      I think the issue is - I would buy something positioned as a very long-living and good machine for that price.

      Like Sun workstations were. The design and experience of everything.

      The issue with Apple is that these things look expensive, temporary and inconvenient (that feeling of concept nice to look at … for a day or so). And what’s worse, they are.

      I hope Larry Ellison gets geriatric demented sooner, maybe then he’ll try to resurrect Sun as a separate entity. Just joking, even to Larry Ellison I only wish good health.