• El_guapazo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Fell apart or was sabotaged?

    I would think they work fine everywhere else and defended vigorously. This story sounds like a half truth.

    We need more transparency about why it failed.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah man, I was in the Navy on a LHD, shit comes with helicopters and even an amphibious landing craft, and the US pretty much always has one in the area.

      There was never a single need for the dock, it was always a stalling tactic.

      Like, there is just no valid reason the US ever needs a fucking dock to get equipment/supplies onto the shore.

      For fucks sake, we were “air dropping” aid out of airplanes from bomb height like care packages in Call of Duty…

      We could have been sitting it down directly into a controlled forward operating base and letting the aid be distributed like civilized people instead of whoever shows up with weapons first gets all of it.

      Nothing about any of this has made sense if Biden actually wanted to help and not just make it look like he was helping.

      The US military is not this incompetent

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        What orders would you give to these soldiers in case they were approached by a large mob, some of them armed?

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Have you been on US military foreign aid missions before?

          It’s not a new thing, we do it all the fucking time.

          Why do you think Palestinians are going to behave like a fucking hoard of zombies?

          That’s carries some pretty racist connotations…

          They can handle queuing up for aid especially if it’s being handed out systematically and not dropped from thousands of feet to starving masses.

          Like, just not waiting 7 months into this genocide would have made things more orderly.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Like, just not waiting 7 months into this genocide would have made things more orderly.

              Also, read articles before you link them…

              Jihad Abu Watfa was standing in the rubble along a dark stretch of coastal road southwest of Gaza City when he saw Israeli military tanks approaching. He began recording on his phone just as a heavy barrage of gunfire flashed before his eyes.

              “We are now under siege, a tank is beside us and it’s shelling,” Abu Watfa could be heard saying in the video, which he shared with CNN.

              The 27-year-old was surrounded by hundreds of other Palestinians who had gathered for an aid delivery on February 29 when Israeli soldiers accompanying the humanitarian convoy opened fire. More than 100 people were killed and 700 injured, according to Gaza’s health ministry.

              The IDF opening fire is what caused the death…

              Any issues before the first shot was because the people who were committing the genocide against those people who were waiting for aid were pointing fucking tanks at them…

              How do you not understand how people would be on fucking edge?

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Are they still in danger of being murdered by genocidal far right extremists?

                  Yes.

                  Would they be less afraid if Biden did the right thing and provided aid and the assurance of safety at least while it was distributed?

                  Also yes.

                  This ain’t complicated, but you keep “just asking questions”…

                  I’m starting to think that none of this has any chance of being productive.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    They wouldn’t need this pier if, you know, we stopped funding Israel to continue this genocide.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      But Biden will literally never do that…

      He’s spent 50 years saying he would never hold them accountable for anything if it means even slowing aid down.

      Hell, when Obama was prez and Biden was just the VP. biden publicly shit talked Obama when he threatened to cut aid to Israel due to their human rights abuses.

      Biden made a big deal about how the only thing that works with Israel is giving them everything they want and holding them accountable would backfire.

      Obama was smart enough to not listen, and Israel toned it down.

      Joe learned absolutely nothing from that. Or worse, has always known it’s bullshit and still does.

      I really thought in 2020 I was done playing “is the president honestly this stupid or lying?”

      But it looks like we’ll keep playing till 2028 at least

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    We wasted months not giving them aid to build this pier…

    It cost 320 million dollars, and lasted a fucking week.

    And Palestinians are still starving to death.

    I legitimately don’t know if it being such a giant waste of time and money was intentional.

    With the shit Biden openly says, it’s hard to believe there’s not worse shit he’s managing not to say. If not, isn’t saying whatever horrible pro genocide shit that pops into your head one of the reasons trump is bad?

    trump is obviously worse, but running a campaign on that makes a genocide ok won’t get a Dem in office.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I legitimately don’t know if it being such a giant waste of time and money was intentional.

      If the purpose was to bring aid to the Palestinians, they’d just open the border crossing.

      Rather, everything we see is consistent trying to create the appearance of doing something to help, but making sure you don’t actually affect the famine.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        everything we see is consistent trying to create the appearance of doing something to help, but making sure you don’t

        That’s the most we get these days. With pretty much any topic.

        At most we get some breadcrumbs for optics right before elections, but never any real work towards real solutions.

        It’s why not paying attention and just voting “blue no matter who” should never be a plan except for one election in a blue moon where something crazy just happened.

        This is Trump’s 3rd election now, if the DNC can’t find a good candidate that can beat Trump and give Dem voters what we want, then we need new people running the DNC.

        If the DNC won’t change, we need a whole ass new party.

        Going along with this bullshit isn’t helping anyone.

        The absence of evil isn’t good. It’s just the absence of evil.

        We need politicians actually willing to do good things. Hell, it’s not even “absence of evil” the good guys are funding genocides these days.

        It’s just “slightly less evil”.

        • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          While I definitely agree with your general sentiment, how do you contend with the 66% of voters who think Israel is justified in this war, and the nearly 40% who think the way it is waged is acceptable? Wouldn’t the electoral risk be even more dire if you alienate them?

          I’m not asking that rhetorically, I think it’s a genuinely hard problem.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            how do you contend with the 66% of voters who think Israel is justified in this war,

            My initial opinion is that 66% is about half republicans, leaving 16% of Biden voters feeling that he’s doing the right thing…

            Can you link the survey you’re referencing?

            • bobburger@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I found this article about a NPR poll which has a breakdown of support for Israel by age group and party affiliation.

              I’m not sure exactly where Biden’s position on the Gaza invasion falls on this poll, but it seems closest to “Support Israels right to defend itself while encouraging a cease fire”. Biden definitely isn’t withholding all support, and he definitely isn’t fully supporting the military actions against Hamas.

              About 33% of Democrats and 27% independents think the US should suspend aid to Israel until there is a cease fire.

              Similarly 38% of gen z/millennials think there should be a cease fire until there is a suspension of aid. This is the smallest voting cohort at about 36% of the population according to Wikipedia, and also the least likely to vote historically. Perhaps voter turn out would be higher among this group if we had a different candidate, but no one is going to cater their political platform to a group that had never reliably voted, especially if doing so costs them votes among reliable voters.

              Among Gen X and older less that 19% support a stopping aid until a cease fire happens. This is the largest and most likely to vote voting cohort.

              Also noted in the article, Biden has a 15 point lead over Trump among baby boomers who have very little support for a ceasefire.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Support Israels right to defend itself while encouraging a cease fire”.

                That wording is all you should need to hear to disregard the poll…

                Literally no one is saying Israel can’t defend itself.

                And it’s not what Israel has been doing the last 7 months.

                • bobburger@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  That wording is all you should need to hear to disregard the poll…

                  That’s a pretty extraordinary assumption to make.

                  Regardless of how you feel about that option there is little support among voters for withholding support for Israel until a ceasefire is reached. Less than 25% among all respondents, and less than 33% among Democrats and Independents who I’d consider potential Biden voters.

                  If you have a different poll I’d love to see it.

                • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Literally no one is saying Israel can’t defend itself.

                  And it’s not what Israel has been doing the last 7 months.

                  Then that depends on what one thinks is necessary to achieve this.

                  They tried sitting back soaking up rockets and that just resulted in Hamas digging in and preparing to put a genocide on them

                  There’s probably no real other option to defend against this happening again than going in heavy handed. Just like the US had to put a genocide on IS in Mosul and Raqqa to conclude those sieges