• Monstrosity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    This isn’t going to be popular, but part of the problem is not acknowledging that 42%. It’s fucking insulting, frankly. Plenty of women voted for the bear.

    EDIT: In light of reports of tons of guys saying “your body my choice” and shit, I actually regret writing this & everything below.

    Like, what the fuck, boys?

    • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      52% of white women voted for trump.

      Chances are that many of the people crying about men voting trump, are part of a demographic that mostly voted trump.

      Trump apparently won the popular vote anyway. Most of everyone who voted, voted trump. But let’s focus on men and then be surprised that young men who are very insecure about themselves anyway, feel attacked by the left and choose the right.

  • NeilBru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The “man or bear in the woods” question is obvious ragebait. Thinking people don’t entertain hyperbolic hypotheticals that are proposed to sow divisive rhetoric.

    The gender war is a psy-op proxy for the class war.

    ::: To be clear, I’m a proponent of market-socialism economically who wants a functional federal republic like we’re supposed to have on paper. I am not a “tankie”, nor do I want anything to do with them.

    When I say “class war”, I say we fight it with the ballot, and a gun if it gets ugly to the point of no recourse (that is still far away, thankfully).

    I mean, what the fuck are people gonna do against Predator drones with Hellfires? Be vaporized as cannon fodder? We’d be gullible rubes for the whims of the “enlightened LeAdErS of the People’s Revolution”, that’s what. :::

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      There’s also a TON left unsaid in it. Is the man armed? are you armed? Is it a hiking path? Is it the middle of the forest? Are you camping or just walking? what kinda bear? is the bear just walking or is it attacking?

      • lady_maria@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        You’re overthinking it; those questions are totally irrelevant to the point. Though, to be fair, the question doesn’t exactly specify this at face value.

        It’s really just a thought experiment: would you rather take your chances, alone, with a random bear/man in the woods? You don’t get a weapon. You dont get to choose which man or which bear, or what they do. It’s a gamble.

        • redisdead@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          If I’m in the woods, it’s because I don’t need nor want human interaction. Please pick the bear and leave me the fuck alone thanks.

  • NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think in this situation it is probably more important to look into why more than half the population chose Trump.

  • Murvel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    God, the whole of Lemmy is such a meme right now; the majority of women voted Trump as well!

    Lmao!..

    • GingerWitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah no. Either Musk or Putin learned how to hack without detection. It’s WHOLLY unlikely that majorities of women were polled, a gender gap was polled, and somehow that all magically disappeared. That is a STRONG indicator of hacking.

    • pinkystew@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Why would you use the word meme in your analysis if your problem is that the content is meme-like

  • SparrowHawk@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Correct me if im wrong, not American;

    People in your family can know if you register to vote as a dem o rep right? I suspect that if voting registration was anonymous like normal countries a lot less white women would have voted for trump

    • thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      You don’t have to be registered under a specific party I think. I’m not American, but you can register as an independent. And you don’t have to vote for the party you’re registered for. Actually I have no idea why you even register for certain parties in the first place

      • shastaxc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s so you can participate in primary elections for that party. Some people who vote Dem in the general election will sometimes register as Republican so that they can vote for spoiler candidates in the Republican primary. There’s not enough people doing it for that plan to really have any impact though.

        But the same logic applies if you are trying to hide your votes from nosy family. Family members have enough info on you to be able to look up your party registration so if you are afraid of them causing drama, you can register as whatever party the rest of your family is registered as and then vote for the other side in the general election. The actual votes you cast cannot be traced back to you… Which can raise other concerns like not being able to verify if your vote actually counted.

    • SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Nothing is wrong with them, but I get not wanting to gamble with thos odds.

      Especially when, according to the national park service, “when bear encounters do happen, they are most often nonviolent”. So if you had to gamble…

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          “the overwhelming majority of these m&ms are not poisonous.”

          mmm sounds delicious

            • pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              no, I made it up because it’s an easy analogy. but my argument is still different on two fronts.

              first, the claim is absolute when it should be comparative. documented immigrants commit less crime than citizens. undocumented immigrants even less than them.

              https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014704117

              men on the other hand commit crime in ridiculously higher rates than women, and even disregarding that, men commit more serious crimes than women. technically more than bears too.

              second, my argument isn’t about opposing men, so it’s not even comparable to the opposing immigration argument. it’s about the fact that men pose a real threat and maybe it’s appropriate to take action to address that rather than get defensive about it.

                • pyre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  I didn’t say I invented it. I said I made it up. it’s not that wild of an analogy to be impossible to come up with it independently. i was thinking of grains and then remembered an old reddit post about putting skittles in an m&ms bowl.

                  wow they probably stole that too, since it’s such a crazy original idea that no two people can think of it.

                  again, “FBI crime stats but for men” is not a good critique because again, it’s not comparable to black people. unless you think the police unfairly favor immigrants, especially undocumented immigrants. women do get more lenient sentences but that wasn’t my argument.

                  if you have any evidence that women commit as many and as serious crimes as men please share. or if you think men are historically oppressed and financially disadvantaged as context to their crime stats, I’d like to hear that.

                  pointing at vague similarities to other arguments when they are nothing like each other won’t cut it.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    When Harris was nominated, I told a friend of mine that my biggest fear was it was going to energize racists and sexists because she was black and a woman. I though she was great candidate, but the level of racism and sexism in this county is beyond insane.

    • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well it’s a good thing your worries were unfounded then because Trump got 72 million votes in 2020, and as of right now he’s got those same 72 million votes in 2024. 10 million or so democrats sat out this election compared to 2020 and that’s why Harris lost.