• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sixty-two Democrats joined 207 Republicans in supporting the amendment, while Democratic leadership, which typically offers a suggestion on which way to vote, gave “no recommendation.”

    We got to have more standards than “not a Republican”.

    These assholes in sheep clothing aren’t on our side.

    Like, it doesn’t matter if you’re at “the cool table” if Nazis start sitting down and no one throws them out, you don’t keep fucking sitting with the Nazis. You start a new table.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The question was:

            How can you organize voters with a district like the Texas 33rd?

            I said “the internet”…

            And now you’re demanding I prove checks notes something else no one else has been talking about?

            Why?

            • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I said “the internet”… And now you’re demanding I prove…

              I asked you to prove your claims. (if you can’t, of course, nobody should believe them). Not something unrelated. But thanks for the

              Red Herring

              red herring is something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important question.[1] It may be either a logical fallacyor a literary device that leads readers or audiences toward a false conclusion. A red herring may be used intentionally, as in mystery fiction or as part of rhetorical strategies (e.g., in politics), or may be used in argumentation inadvertently.[2]

              Why don’t you just answer the question?

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                How can you organize voters with a district like the Texas 33rd?

                I said “the internet”…

                That was “my claim”.

                That “the Internet” is how you would organize people in a sprawling district because that doesn’t rely on geography and in person meetings. It’s also just how you do shit now.

                Then you asked me:

                Let’s see evidence of “the internet” solving extreme gerrymandering

                And acting that I claimed it could. When I never said that because I was answering a completely different question.

                The only way that makes sense, is if you dont know what me or that other person was talking about.

                • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  That was “my claim”.

                  Backed up with nothing but excuses and self-serving bullshit. You have zero evidence to back up your “claims” …

                  Blaming me for calling you out and then blaming both me and others for your own actions and their consequences is textbook projection.

                  Facing the consequences of your actions is not a state of victimhood