To cause chaos. A nation arguing with itself will be less inclined to mess around internationally.
Sending things to both parties is more likely to cause chaos.
Also known as snooggums on midwest.social and kbin.social.
To cause chaos. A nation arguing with itself will be less inclined to mess around internationally.
Sending things to both parties is more likely to cause chaos.
A two (or more) state solution is also a possible outcome. For example, Gaza and the West Bank could become Palestine as a separate country from Israel. There would need to be a massive change in borders for that to even possibly work out, but an independent Palestine is more likely to lead to eventual stability than mashing everyone together.
Which is different than Israel not existing.
You understand the difference, right?
Israel does not need to stop existing for the genocide to end or for the government officials to be tried for war crimes.
It isn’t like Italy needed to stop existing after WWII…
The continued existence of Israel does not require an ongoing genocide, so those are not in opposition.
If someone accused you of being pro-Trump and you said “I’m registered independent” do you think they’d be like ‘oh, nm carry on then’?
If they asked I would say ‘no’ instead of trying to dodge the question.
You asked about something specific, whether someone was ‘officially’ something and I answered the question. You asked a question that is apparently different than the thing you want to argue about, which is who they (currently?) support.
The mental gymnastics are just mind blowing with that crowd.
That they are a traitor to the nation and should be ashamed, but they are officially a Democrat because of their registration. That is why they get to vote in the primary, because registering makes it official no matter what the reason is.
I am not registered for any party, and the fact that I end up always voting for candidates of one party does NOT make me an official member of that party.
If only there was some kind of pattern!
Unless you’re willing to declare some objective standard for what everyone considers an ‘official Democrat’…
Registering as a Democrat makes someone an “official Democrat” since registering makes it official.
Narrator: He did not start to get a damn clue.
Leeloo Dallas Multipass!
We are well past the tipping point of malicious websites being indistinguishable from legit sites unless tou pay attention to extra informatjon like the address bar. I would say that most of the websites I used to enjoy have gone to shit between ads and ditching their better writers for cheaper staff or AI. Most of the internet is crap.
But there is stilll enough helpful content that the whoe thing isn’t worthless and I doubt it ever will be.
Clearly he was shot by the knife!
Stupid derisive autocorrect!
I am adding this disclaimer due to repeated questions about the genuine authenticity of Popsie Funk and his music.
I don’t think that the artist in question is faking this.
All that being said, while this particular case isn’t, I suppose one could imagine such a “trying to pretend to be human” artist existing.
They were pretending, and added the disclaimer because people bugged them about it. They still worded the disclaimer as if Popsie Funk was a real person (his music).
The internet will never be useless. There will always be a large number of sites that are not capitalist hellholes that only exist to steal user’s data or scam users or do other malicious things. This may be down to things like credit unions, federated social media, and non-profits that exist to make the world better, but there will always be something that is out there that keeps it from being useless.
I blame autocorrect.
“We need less decisive rhetoric” said the only party that is using decisive rhetoric.
From the article:
I read this as the group attempted to send Trump’s email’s to staff of both candidate’s staff, but maybe it means both candidates confirmed the emails were sent to Biden?