Ya we should leave making stuff up to Musky

Literally knife to gun fight. (Edit: allegedly, no video [yet])

Poor guy. Wish he could’ve been treated instead of killed. Wonder if here in the US we could put mancatchers/catch poles to good use:

An example of someone ostensibly suffering a mental health crisis eventually being subdued by a large number of responders with said poles.

Even the redditor who shared that photo said oops, didn’t know it was going to be weaponized!

RE: the identity of goose guy [Snopes], I see comment from the Ohio DNR, but seems he’s unidentified at this time

Can’t entirely blame her for the entire arc of this silly thing because there were certainly willful instances of people sharing misattributed footage. I’m thinking of the body cam of the American woman who killed a cat with her bare hands.

A US citizen, but! she wasn’t white so might as well call her an immigrant having a snack.

Also isn’t he defending migrants in the clip?

Non-Meta Link

files.catbox.moe/nilwcr.mp4

Doubtless you have that. Off the top of my head, you should expect to find:

1. Those who want to control women.
2. Those who are uncomfortable with the control aspect but want to get elected.
3. Pro choice people who want to get elected.
4. A mix of comfort and discomfort with the ideas of pro choice and controlling women, but still want to get elected.

Yeah. Kinda like a storm trooper helmet too.

Ohh gotcha thanks

Cash?

I’ve never like actually voted before but Taylor wouldn’t talk about it if it weren’t important

Then they do their research (well they did, they read her post) and tap her story to get registered. She follows it up with another post around Election Day and they go vote.

(No offense Swifties, just using one example. We can’t all be highly politically active, high-information citizens. Those who are will have gaps elsewhere in their lives instead.)

So embarrassing for you to publicly admit the owner didn’t grant you permission

I recently looked into this after it seemed like Facebook messed with my back button on a private mobile window:

Someone pointed out that it’s nice to have, for example, your email provider know that you probably want to go back for a message to your inbox instead of going back to the previous page.

But what if browsers monitored which sites abused the feature and showed a pop-up when you click the back button, just like they offer to show you notifications? They could show you:

This site has been reported to hijack the back button. Would you like to go back to the last domain that you visited?

and offer to remember the setting.

I agree it gets complex for users. But pushing back a bit, wouldn’t we instead say:

We could tell new users “Sign up on Lemmy.com and if you decide you don’t like the UI aren’t a pedophile just choose an alternative and use the same credentials to sign in make sure you start blocking.”

I have in mind that the top blocked instances are pedo oriented. Also seems like it would create a liability issue for servers mirroring that content.

Although it’s not a perfect solution to choose a default instance for new users, I do think it’s a powerful question to eliminate.

Daily crime journal wow

Just checked something and it makes me wonder if they struck different deals than MSN:

View, say, a Business Insider article on MSN, and use the share button, and it will share the article hosted on Business Insider. Do the same on Yahoo and it shares the same Yahoo News URL that you were reading it on.

That kind of thing is their style

To register a new account?

If so that’s costing Kim Jong hours!