Stephen Miller looks Arabic to me.
Stephen Miller looks Arabic to me.
That happened to a nearby hospital where I live and it’s an abortion friendly state. It’s because hospitals don’t make any money from it compared to other departments like surgery and cancer care where they can bill Medicaid/Medicare out the ass.
It’s still malpractice. Doesn’t matter if it’s illegal.
Working on Firefox reader mode for me. Not sure how my extensions are affecting it.
Indictment means that a grand jury have decided to charge you with a crime. The judge puts a warrant out for your arrest.
Definitely sitting at home, getting paid leave and talking to his union provided lawyer and was told not to say anything by his coworkers who didn’t arrest him for shooting multiple people.
You can get a Linux container image as well I think.
It’s just the phrasing that lawyers always use because it’s difficult to prove that someone actually knew something. So even if the person denies they knew it wasn’t one hundred percent true you can still make the argument that they should have known it wasn’t true. Although, you cant always be sued for defamation about a group of people. It depends on the laws in that state
In legal speak the term is “knew or should have known”
Even then, a state constitution can’t override the federal constitution. You would need an amendment at the federal level for every statute that violates it. There’s still laws on the books that were perfectly legal at the time they were passed, but never got repealed. Although I do think that it should be required to repeal laws that are completely unconstitutional such as sundown laws. Some states will pass preemptive laws that are conditional on a change in opinion from the supreme Court.
The people who wrote the constitution could have never imagined how it could be interpreted 250 years later.
It is a punishment in the form of public humiliation, taking your autonomy, and dehumanizing you. People will automatically assume you’ve done something wrong if you’re in handcuffs.
The issue is that some laws make complete sense, but you can have an activist judge or the SC declare it unconstitutional. Legislatures are elected and they can’t be expected to know how a law can be interpreted.
Even something as simple as a noise ordinance could be considered a first amendment violation in certain cases.
I live in Illinois, they passed an assault weapons ban last year. Of course the gun people claimed it was unconstitutional because of the 2nd amendment. It’s not but someone tried to make that argument and there’s a non-zero number of judges who would agree with them.
The first amendment doesn’t stop politicians from acting in bad faith. There’s no consequences for passing bad laws. Politicians often use this tactic to make headlines and make their opponents waste resources. The only thing politicians have to worry about is getting elected again.
This man has never set foot in an industrial site.
the not-uncommon tendency in a constrained budget environment to prioritize initiating new missions as opposed to maintaining and upgrading existing support assets has produced an infrastructure that would not be viewed as acceptable under most industrial standards,
He looks like a cartoon villain.
Here is our Wednesday. She also checks under the bed for monsters when I put my daughter to bed at night.
They are really leaning on these fake South American controversies. There’s another one about a Venezuelan gang taking over an apartment building in Colorado.
I would have to figure out how the NYC birth certificate system works and I live halfway across the country. It’s too close to the election to do that, and getting a passport can take months and hundreds of dollars.
I don’t support deporting cartel members. If we do that, then they’re free to continue operating. If we try to prosecute them, it puts the prosecutor, witnesses, jury, judges, all in danger. We should declare them terrorists and ship them to gitmo.