It’s okay to hate both terrorist organizations.

Probably not, explicitly because the charge only applied to the kicking.

They could get longer if they find out who lit it on fire.

They absolutely only fact checked the wildest claims. The kind of stuff that radicalized people, like baby murder.

TBF, he still got some preferential treatment, which he said himself. What if he wasn’t Tyreek Hill?

B+ for fact checking without bias (meaning not attacking both to just appear unbiased).

D for favoring one over the other with extra rebuttal time. Although I think it made Trump look worse.

I remember him going on a rant and accidentally describing single payer healthcare and then never mentioned it again.

The moderators are actually treating them equally. It’s just that Trump is making the ridiculous claims.

That’s nice to see. Usual the new organizations want to grill both to appear unbiased.

I came into the thread for exactly that.

Living in the state, I think the anger aspect was entirely reasonable.

I am against the death penalty. I do believe some people deserve death. But I also don’t think anyone should have that authority over someone who isn’t a threat.

So yeah, I agree that I’m not in a position to say that someone deserves death.

To be clear, I don’t think the implication was why you were downvoted. I think you just sounded a bit pedantic. Like you were correcting them without adding to the conversation.

I just happened to enjoy the pendantry.

By the way, I’ve also been in a position where I was downvoted with zero explanation, even after asking for it. So I get the frustration. Even a bad explanation is preferred to no explanation. So I hope that helps and you continue to contribute however you feel comfortable.

No worries. I don’t mind being told that I’m wrong. And the implication I mentioned is purely just my own observation.

The post to me sounded like they were calling out their sister who thinks men are being raised to be too feminine. It’s a common accusation that younger people are “raised by women” without enough masculine role models. It’s all Alpha-Beta theory BS.

The commenter you replied to was saying that applies to every son.

Your comment seemed to inadvertently offer a solution that the Alpha-Beta types would NOT be happy with, gay parents. No “mothering” required.

I just read your two comments. I mean this as constructive and helpful. Sorry if it comes off as rude.

On the bridge you start interrogating about the incorrect answer to your first question. It’s quite presumptuous. I wouldn’t have downvoted. But it also doesn’t seem like a big deal.

On your gay adoption comment, I get what you were saying. It came off really pedantic. But also, the implication is hilarious that the way to make men “manly” is to have them raised by gay men.

Empathy for rapists and murderers is NOT the reason I’m against the death penalty.

I just looked up something birther related and the second result was a legit looking site that just had a ton of misinformation posted in 2016.

At least with the birther shit, there was a question of whether Obama should just put the question to rest or ignore it.

This is literally just an insult for her being multiracial. And Politico is asking if she’s hiding something.

They asked for her reaction to Trump being extremely racist.

Politico - “Okay but what if Trump is right?”

HOLY SHIT. This is a much bigger deal than people realize. Politico is suggesting that her identity is in question to begin with. It’s not.

She didn’t evade a question about her identity because there is no question about her identity. She passed an opportunity to get upset over Trump’s comments.

“If this were illegal” is already a bad assumption. In the U.S., SCOTUS already determined that the 14th Amendment is unenforceable.

And any other time, there requires somebody to file charges.

2 and 3 are clearly saying don’t be antisemitic, even if it’s aimed at Israel. Antisemitism is still bad. Although, lots of people deal with double standards outside of protected biases. (Literally anyone taking land from anyone. If anything, Israel has benefited from double standards.)

5 is actually adding a distinction. You can’t blame random people for another country doing stuff. I fail to see how this one is bad at all.

1 and 4 are worrying though. As you said, self-determination is fine. But you should be able to criticize actions. Banning that is a clear violation of the constitution.