It’s also in Mean Girls 🤭
Keep it light, keep it moving.
I am doing no harm.
It’s also in Mean Girls 🤭
Funnily enough, as a kid I always associated shoplifting with women stealing cosmetics and once saw a woman run past me with a security guard chasing after her. It’s one of the only crimes I do associate primarily with women but only because of circumstance. Lol
You said it, so now “they” do. ;)
They’re not dead center, so they’re ackshually diehard leftists, didn’t you get the memo? The left is trying to kill Trump! Clutch those pearls hard!
Oh, I know one place like that! It sounds like One Tan Ammo. Dang it, it’s on the tip of my tongue.
how all the vaccines have some chemical in it like bleach
Ohh, been there! But in my case, the kicker was that she then went off on a tangent on how her daughter was a medical doctor who “believes in all this science stuff” and how “the younger generations are more brainwashed”. Bruh.
Ohh wow. What a way to make a lifelong friend!
Right? I say let them keep the anchor offboard the sinking ship. Vance has been an embarrassment from the beginning and it’s funny to see them take his Ls.
How is it this close at all? xD
And with good reason. It didn’t help that Dubya was a sketchy sob!
Where is he?
Dunno, prolly running the country or smth. 🤷♂️
Maybe OP is fluent and I’ll give the benefit of the doubt but I’ve also seen many developers specifically from India use Grammarly or ChatGPT to correct their writing. Idk, it’s something to consider.
I don’t mind someone doing whatever on their phone out of sight. But this shit drives me insane. You won’t watch that damn video ever again in your life, stop ruining it for everyone else!
Before November. Good!
Jack Dorsey left the board, so I’m ok with that. Good for them!
I’m not sure what this one’s called but it’s very pulular in Mexico.
Because a lot of people don’t spend effort researching the sources
I don’t think that’s fair or true, especially on Lemmy. We don’t need babysitting. And even if it is an endorsement, what examples of reviews do you have that call MBFC into question? I say we don’t bog down ourselves with whether they labeled something center-left that may be center-right or whatnot. What matters is the facts. Everyone can have a say in how they interpret whatever slant they find. Nobody takes it as the ultimate judge. We don’t need it to be impeccably accurate and perfect, either.
In my case, I pay little attention to the rating on sources I already trust. Instead, I use it to hold obvious propagandists to face the quality of their posts. I have many instances of that happening. There’s value in this.
If people want to do the research to evaluate a source, they can do that on their own.
This is one way to get started doing that. It’s a convenient shortcut for the search I was going to do anyway. I’m surprised you preach about source evaluation and push back on this in a post about allowing for multiple sources.
Also my source. You know, when used like a person with more than two brain cells would. Instead of nit-picking at the bot, why don’t we look at the bigger picture for the value it provides?
Relevant