You too

I’d hardly call what I said making fun of him. If you’re that sensitive though, like I said - go off. You won’t hurt my feelings fella.

There’s nothing wrong with me saying what I said in my original comment. It was lighthearted poking. That’s all.

Mr serious decided to jump in with the 99 rules of gun safety that I’m an idiot for not nodding along solemnly to.

Why wouldn’t I jab back? If I were trying to be rude I would have been rude. lol.

You should take my previous advice and chill. It’s not that serious - once again.

You’re clearly the dull one here.

Attacking my sense of personal responsibility because I said “can’t have 2 rule number 1’s”?

It’s not me that looks like the ass but go off, hole!

And now I have$97.65 worth of food at Wendy’s that I don’t know what to do with, thanks dick

Hey bro? Calm down, it was a joke. It’s not that serious. Did you skip your meds today pal?

Rule number 1 of life: you can’t have two rule number 1s

Steve Erwin voice: hee we 'ave an actual Trump Supporrta in the woild, friends. Be caaful! 'E’s dangerous! Gotta be reeeeaalll quoiet around these beauts.

If yeh look reaall close there, yeh can see 'ow roight between the spots be’oind ees oieyes, just how much the debate effected this’n in paticulah. Fascinating stuff WOAH, caaful now don’t get too close, Bob. That’s roight… noice an easy.

Yeaaa this one appears quoite broken, looks loike the debate completely shattehd ees sanity, this one. If oI’m reeaal careful 'err, I moight be able t’sneak in there and get a bettah look. Nice an easy, nice an easy.

If you were happy that’s the important thing, but yes, companies still have a long (ext x 1000) way to go across the board generally.

I see yeah, before all the crazy diseases borne of overpopulation etc.

Lol as long as nothing was due that day.

Company still comes first, technically!

I’m not entirely sure what you mean by natural humans - are there artificial ones?? 🤔

Sure, it is an extreme. As in my edit I stated: this is due to sanitation. It is all over the board throughout the 15th-18th century world because pandemics/diseases/epidemics came and went and sanitation was so low and medicine was so bad that people dropped like flies, and thus did the life expentency average.

In particular, my “25 year l.e.” example was about 18th century France.

No? Medical care and sanitation. Unless youre speaking of a specific event in time. But yes it has tripled in the 25yo cases? Avg life span now is in the 70s.

Right, like uhh you know the average life span for a healthy male used to be 25 years right? Did you think that was for no reason? Smfh.

Did you think 90 years passed and suddenly the life span tripled?

The idiocy

Edit: to make sure some of the responses aren’t misunderstanding my point - medicine.

Scientific advances. Technology, research, people knowing how to literally wash their fucking hands added years to the lifespan.

And yes it has tripled in some cases. 18th century France the life expectancy was twenty four years old.

This increase to what we see today is LARGELY due to medical care and sanitation alone.

It’s all over the board back then, in fact, because of sanitation. Diseases would.come and go and life expentencies would sink like a tanker because sanitation was non existent.

So yes I exaggerated the time span, obviously, but I wasn’t kidding about the tripling part - if a bit vaguely.

She tested positive for codeine, the weakest opiate you can possibly get because to trigger any bigger result you’d need a thousand poppy seeds or more.

The hospital is 1000000000² % at fault here. Any competent medical staff doesn’t let this happen.

Hilarious they used ‘giga’ train. Rob and Elon just did that Diablo 4 stream the other day and Rob says ‘giga’ 6x per video. Clearly rubbed off on old Elon.

Lol ok

Except problem solving, memory, thought processing etc, right.

Sure, and you can also get smarter with hard work and studying. So that tracks. See what I did there lol

Aside from creativity (which elon also excels at) and social intelligence (which he does not - or does he) it is a good predictor of intelligence. I mean psychologist or not, you can argue it til you’re blue in the face but tests measure aptitude, there’s a reason the entire world uses them. Saying someone is “good at tests but not good at the thing” is just a lazy argument.

Temperature measures heat, which is one of many indicators of how it’ll feel outside. IQ tests measure “reasoning/problem solving, memory, pattern recognition, and information processing speed.” As a psychologist you know that already! Those are a few of the many indicators of a persons intelligence! See how that works?

Carry on!

Is it perfect? Obviously not! But to say it’s inaccurate is just wrong.