What an A-hole. Guess he can’t afford a saw.

And those damn screws.

  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    There is no codes that say that, maybe local bylaws, but to say code is just pathologically and factually wrong.

    But feel free to provide the code that says this, if you can find it, you kind of need to support asinine claims like that.

    Also nothing about this picture or anything OP said has claimed to be from the USA, but even than, the model US building code has absolutely no specifications about what side a fence “faces”.

    You realize CODES are entirely structural and would NEVER have a stipulation, like that yeah…?

    So don’t confuse a local municipal bylaw/ordinace, with “code”, they a fundamentally different things, but of course a laymen like you would never understand a nuance like that.

    • tritonium@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      When you finally resort to semantics to counter, you know you’ve lost, but… not only that, you’re absolutely wrong! Zoning codes are what state which way a fence must face. Lmao, how many more Ls you want to take buddy? Confidently incorrect again!

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        And still doesn’t link any, what a shocker.

        And it’s not semantics, I know codes don’t state it, and local ordinances do, and idiots like you conflate them which makes any intellectual conversations about it nigh impossible.

        It’s always funny seeing a lamen talk so confidently about something they have no actual understanding about.

        But sure “codes” state that, so let’s see one than, please. So I can show exactly what you’re conflating as “code”.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            Your link is broken, but I can see it’s a PDF and its name, so I can tell that’s not by any stretch of the definition a code.

            But I pulled up the “ordinance” that it likely would be referring (which still isn’t a “code”), and would you look at that, not one mention about what side it should “face”.

            So again, laymen with absolutely zero understanding and this is the exact shit I’ve been taking about. You can’t even link the right thing, and it’s not even a code lmfao. But sure insult me to show how correct you are….

            • tritonium@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              26 days ago

              The link is not broken it works… and these are zoning code requirements that specify how fences are built and there is a section about which way it faces. I can’t help you’re computer illiterate and can’t figure out how to view a pdf. You lost buddy, you can try all the mental gymnastics you want but this is getting sad and pathetic for you now.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                26 days ago

                and these are zoning code requirements that specify how fences are built and there is a section about which way it faces.

                You think zoning requirements are code…?

                Your document doesn’t load, and sorry zoning requirements aren’t code, and I’m sure your PDF specifies that.

                I knew you couldn’t find a code that states that, and you didn’t, but try to claim you did dude, sure.

                As I said, laymen and the fact you think zoning bylaws are code is just fucking asinine lmfao. What a muppet. This is the EXACT thing I was referring to, and you go and prove it unequivocally for all of us. Fucking idiot lmfao, thinks zoning requirements are fucking code what a fucking idiot.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                26 days ago

                I managed to find an image of it.

                And not surprisingly, it doesn’t use the word code, nor does it refer to any building codes either.

                They use regulation, requirements and standards, none of those being codes, and all have very specific definitions so they aren’t confused. Yet moronic idiots like you still do it…. See, you’re a fucking idiot that’s conflating local ordinances with model building codes. Codes are for structural things, not aesthetics you muppet.

                • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  26 days ago

                  Man… talk about confidently wrong. That’s not the document. And the link/pdf works fine.

                  Glad to see that you have great interactions with other people as well! I hope you don’t forget to downvote brigade them too!

                  Interesting that the document was issued by the City itself and clearly says “zoning code”. Weird. I mean superstar you can’t possibly be wrong!

                  Edit: oh and to preempt this, cause you might make the dumbest argument ever… No this isn’t old. I’ll even give you a big old arrow to point out the date for you.

                  You might want to call the Planning Services Division at Oshkosh and tell them that you’re right and they’re wrong!

                  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    26 days ago

                    Hey, do you notice how that document you provided doesn’t actually say anything about which way the fence faces…? No of course not, you didn’t actually read the thing and wanted to start another fight because you’re a troll. Too busy looking for other shit you missed the entire original point!

                    Yeah the codes have nothing to do with aesthetics, way to prove my point for me! Lmfao, you truly are an interesting one.

                    I pissed you off so much you’re going through my comments looking for fights now?

                    Edit, you must be autistic or something to be this petty and abusive, while also not comprehending what you’re even arguing about.

                • tritonium@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  25 days ago

                  Wrong document dipshit, holy fuck you are inept… you can’t even open a pdf. You asked for a link, I gave it to you, and you’re too dumb to open it.