• Abnorc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not that bizarre. They don’t have to serve you the content without showing you the ads that make the platform profitable. The freedom goes both ways. I use an ad blocker too, but I don’t think that YouTube is really doing anything wrong here. (Other than possibly ruining their own platform, but that’s their problem that they’re making for themselves.)

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      If they weren’t a monopoly, I’d agree, they can do whatever they want.

      But since they are a monopoly, its a de facto the equivalent of a town square, and they are policing people’s speech, and broadcasting annoying public announcements that nobody wants to hear.

      • Robin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        2 days ago

        A privately owned platform cannot serve the public good. There will always be conflicts of interest. A proper public square should be funded by a competent government (but those are rare) or decentralized.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      I hate the way they‘re doing it and how they push their silly premium subscription in my face whenever I open the app to look something up quick. Adblock all the way. But you‘re right. They have to make money somehow. They‘re a corporation after all. It‘s naive to think they will ever give up.

    • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      When suggested adblock, my mother also do not convinced it’s right to use them. Basically, my mother is grateful for the service provided, and will “pay” by watching ads. I guess this one is not so clear-cut.