vegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 7 months agoTrump classified documents judge is target of more than 1,000 complaints, appeals court revealswww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkTrump classified documents judge is target of more than 1,000 complaints, appeals court revealswww.cnbc.comvegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 7 months agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoCan you expand more on the election interference part? Totally understand inciting an insurrection to be interference, but using campaign funds to manage public relations problems seems a legitimate use.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoSo the falsifying is the illegal bit. The rest of the tweet is moralising.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoYeah, if he was upfront about things then there would be no criminal case However saying he set up shell companies to carry out falsification isn’t moralising
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoWriting “disgusting transactions” is moralistic. Doesn’t help to win over Republicans.
minus-squaressladam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-27 months agoI think you misread. He said “disguising”, which only means intent to keep hidden by masking the truth.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoThe only disgusting (immoral) part of this is Trump cheating on his wife. Everything else could have been achieved perfectly legally (i.e. without disgust) if Trump had been smart. I don’t want to disgust you, but “intending to keep things hidden by masking the truth” is practically the definition of politics.
minus-squaresuction@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-27 months agoDude, you have trouble reading. It says “disguising”. Your side really fails at the most basic human functions, over and over again.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoAnd finding something disgusting is a moral position.
Can you expand more on the election interference part?
Totally understand inciting an insurrection to be interference, but using campaign funds to manage public relations problems seems a legitimate use.
So the falsifying is the illegal bit.
The rest of the tweet is moralising.
Yeah, if he was upfront about things then there would be no criminal case
However saying he set up shell companies to carry out falsification isn’t moralising
Writing “disgusting transactions” is moralistic.
Doesn’t help to win over Republicans.
I think you misread. He said “disguising”, which only means intent to keep hidden by masking the truth.
The only disgusting (immoral) part of this is Trump cheating on his wife.
Everything else could have been achieved perfectly legally (i.e. without disgust) if Trump had been smart.
I don’t want to disgust you, but “intending to keep things hidden by masking the truth” is practically the definition of politics.
Dude, you have trouble reading. It says “disguising”. Your side really fails at the most basic human functions, over and over again.
And finding something disgusting is a moral position.