I’m finally making the switch from Reddit. The Voyager app seems like a pretty seamless transition, but I’d love to hear any tips about using this platform, or what quirks distinguish it from Reddit as a whole.

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    There are a bunch of Anarchists on Lemmy.ml, as well as liberals and Social Democrats. Lemmygrad.ml is the Marxist-Leninist instance, Lemmy.ml is more of a generalist instance, but the users, mods, and admins lean Marxist.

    Just being nitpicky, really.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Most instances will have some political lean, but some will make it a focus, which is a good thing to have that as an option for those who want it.

        • azalty@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It becomes unhealthy when there’s a lot of biased instances, which I feel like there is currently

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Every instance has bias, and will have bias, whether that bias is made public knowledge officially, or swept under the rug, at least in my experience.

            • azalty@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              There’s small bias, and will to have neutrality; and then there’s blatant bias and censorship. We’re in the second option here.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                All bias is bias, neutrality doesn’t really exist in bias. Something being in the “middle” is itself a stance, not without equal bias for it.

                • azalty@jlai.lu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  I disagree. You can always aim to be neutral, stick to the facts, and not favor a specific side. You’ll never fully achieve it, but you can come close to it.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Sticking to the facts doesn’t conflict with taking sides, though. If someone says the sky is blue, and someone else says the sky is green, that doesn’t mean that the sky must be purple.

                    Objectivity is a great value to have, but with objectivity comes bias. We would be biased in favor of the person saying the sky is blue, we would not be neutral, but we would be objective and rational.

                    Refusing to take any side out of a percieved inherent value in moderation is irrational and goes against objectivity.

                    The rational course is to remain objective, while recognizing inherent bias and working with that, rather than trying to feign impartiality.