All skiff users have received a mail in this regard and Skiff has also tweeted about the same.

  • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I mean that sounds pretty reasonable, could they just not think of a name that wasn’t already in prevalent use? Was the goal to be unsearchable for anyone trying to find it?

    That’s like creating a reminders app and naming it task manager.

    • sugartits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Or a spreadsheet program and calling it Excel.

      Or outlook, access…

      The name doesn’t matter if you can establish it.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Their point isn’t that it’s a weird name that isn’t descriptive of what the product does, their point is that cron is an already existing bit of software that does something else.

        It’d be like if MS made a notes app called Steam, Google called a new camera app iTunes, or Apple rebranded Apple Music to PowerShell.

        Minus the trademark infringement I guess. I doubt Cron has that.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Even worse is that it’s close enough.

          Like “recur by specific days but not by months cron”

          Is a valid search for both things. Only one came out in 1975 and has had that name forever, and one decided it would be cool to hijack it