Donald Trump’s running mate JD Vance has dug in on his claim Haitians in an Ohio community are abducting and eating pets, even as the state’s GOP governor and other officials insist there is no evidence of such behavior.

But the salacious claim was easily debunked.

“The Vance campaign provided the Wall Street Journal with a police report to prove their claims about cat-eating Haitians in Springfield. The WSJ spoke to the woman who filed it, who said she later found her cat alive and well in her basement. She also apologized to her Haitian neighbors.” Justin Baragona posted to X with a link to a story in The Wall Street Journal.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    As I recall, in terms of the electoral college, neither Biden nor Harris have, at any point, been projected to beat Trump. It’s not “becoming” scary, it’s been scary for quite some time.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      There’s no one single model doing projections.

      Five Thirty Eight’s, which is one prominent one, has favored Harris somewhat for a while.

      https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/

      Harris wins 64 times out of 100

      in our simulations of the 2024 presidential election.

      Trump wins 36 times out of 100.

      There is a less than 1-in-100 chance of no Electoral College winner.

      Nate Silver – who started Five Thirty Eight and is now off doing his own thing and runs a fork of the model that Five Thirty Eight used to run – had them, last I looked, had Harris and Trump at about about even chances.

      Both Silver’s model and Five Thirty Eight’s model agreed that the debate improved Harris’s chances.