cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/46655413

The Mozilla Foundation, the non-profit arm of the Firefox browser maker Mozilla, has laid off 30% of its employees as the organization says it faces a “relentless onslaught of change.”

  • T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    If Mozilla does become defunct, it does raise the question of whether Chrome would be considered a Google monopoly, and therefore subject to antitrust legislation.

    I can’t imagine any governments would look kindly upon internet access being guarded behind a single company’s product.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I can’t imagine any governments would look kindly upon internet access being guarded behind a single company’s product.

      laughs in 2001

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Google should be subject to antitrust legislation regardless.

      Their position as a monopoly is what enables this.

    • WldFyre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Splitting Chrome from Google wouldn’t make Chrome not a monopoly, though, right?

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        The split might leave a monopoly still, if it’s the only major browser.

        • ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          It would be a lot easier to compete with though, since Google couldn’t treat it as a loss leader that still bring them in search revenue by default.