Bloated and complacent, Chrome might be on the path to playing the same role as IE was playing 15 years ago, shunned by developers and technologically inferior to other browsers.

      • Libb@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        They chose Chromium. Which is the base for Chrome (and all other relevant browsers).

        I know we live in a time of why-give-a-fuck-about-facts, but I see two ‘relevant browsers’ in the top ranking that are not chromium-based:

        Chrome 66.68%
        Safari 18.07%
        Edge 5.25%
        Firefox 2.65%

        (https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share)

        • sibachian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          and out of those 4, 3 are based on a fork that came originally from khtml. so it’s really just firefox that matters in this race. well, until ladybird is ready.

          • Otter@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            https://ladybird.org/

            Well that’s cool

            Ladybird is a brand-new browser & web engine. Driven by a web standards first approach, Ladybird aims to render the modern web with good performance, stability and security.

            Singular focus

            We are focused on one thing: the web browser.

            No monetization

            No “default search deals”, crypto tokens, or other forms of user monetization, ever.

            Announcing the Ladybird Browser Initiative

            Launching our 501©(3) nonprofit.

            Looking forward to it, 2026 feels like a long ways away but I imagine there is lots to do before then

        • ShieldGengar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Your source is missing a bunch of chromium-based browsers to add up to 100%, and there’s no methodology or statistics explanation.

          • Libb@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Your source is missing a bunch of chromium-based browsers to add up to 100%, and there’s no methodology or statistics explanation.

            FFS… I listed the first four results of the first web search result I got. Also, may I remind you that me quoting only the four first results (unfiltered) of a longer list doesn’t change a thing on the ranking: on those 4 firsts (aka, the browsers occupying the 1st to the 4th places, aka the ones ranked before the 5th, 6th places and so on), two of them are not Chromium-based. That’s all I was saying.

            For the rest:

            1. Feel free to quote other sources, obviously. I would be happy to see other numbers with some more of that ‘methodology or statistics explanation’ you’re talking about.
            2. Have a nice day.