• mke@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    187
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    You could say Bluesky is… picking up Steam, eh?

    Sorry, I have no new or interesting insights to offer, I’d hope most already get what’s happening, anyway.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      This is my question too. Search results turn up Bridgy Fed, but that seems to require the account you’re interested in following to go through those steps, which none of the accounts I’m interested in are doing. At least the Threads POTUS account turned on federation so I can view it from Mastodon, but I suspect for the next four years, that account will be pretty quiet, and if it isn’t, I’ll probably want it to be.

    • ahal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Bluesky has 20x the user base (and the gap is growing wider every day).

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Reach?

      If I wasn’t on Lemmy, I wouldn’t even know about Mastodon. It’s not really something you hear of outside of the fediverse, in my experience. Meanwhile, BlueSky is gaining traction and talked about everywhere. Most people don’t care that it’s not exactly decentralized. Most of the things the users on the fediverse care about are not things the average, not-very-tech-saavy person cares about.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Bluesky has a good new user experience, too. Even if you do know about Mastodon, making an account is like"Welcome - figure it out, lol"

        I’d bet if they went the other way, they’d get significantly fewer people signing up for the service…Steam caters to both nerds and casuals alike

    • DaseinPickle@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I really enjoy Mastodon, but it seems to be too confusing with all the servers. I don’t know why, but maybe because people have been conditioned by big tech to use centralised services. Especially Gen Z that grew up with this very big tech controlled internet.

      • sag@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Especially Gen Z that grew up with this very big tech controlled internet.

        Yep, I only 3 person IRL who know and uses Forum or Reddit.

      • TGhost [She/Her]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        They could just put their own instance alive,
        not very hard for them, after they shown us what they can do,
        They can make the changes happen, they showed us already.

        And thoses who wants the feed, just have to subscribe.

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      15 hours ago

      “Why is Mastodon is not”

      Basic grammar hard, apparently.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Valve ceo built a billion dollars mega yacht fleet off selling proprietary games through a proprietary third party launcher. A free and open source decentralized platform does not appeal to them for obvious reasons.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Can you explain the benefits of the fediverse over a centralized private site to a regular person in 5-second quip that will convince them that the relative complexity of using the fediverse versus BlueSky is worth the effort?

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Twitter was bluesky before musk bought it, federation ensures that can’t easily happen to mastodon.

        That’s it.

      • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Centralized and private = enshitification

        Self hosted and federated = not prone to enshitification

        Idk how simple it has to be for people but clearly I’m over estimating people

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Okay. Now, explain the concept of enshitification. And do it using terms that regular folk won’t find crass.

          You know how conservatives live in this bubble where they don’t even see their racism because it’s so normalized? We’re interacting within a bubble where everyone has a very high level of technical competence versus the average person, so we fail to understand just how tech illiterate others are.

          • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Company focus on profit. even if mean overall experience get not gooder

            I dumbed it down to caveman speech for those that still wouldn’t understand. It’s a simple concept all of use that have used the Internet in the past year have experienced.

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Can you explain the benefits of the fediverse over a centralized private site to a regular person in 5-second quip that will convince them that the relative complexity of using the fediverse versus BlueSky is worth the effort?

        Billionares with mega yacht fleets are choosing bluesky over mastodon.

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Like it or not, a regular person doesn’t give two shits about that.

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Talk for yourself, the average person does indeed care about the environment. In the past years there have been massive greenwashing campaigns from companies trying to please the average customer.

            • Ashtear@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Man, I wanna live in your neighborhood. I’m surrounded by bougie people or people with bougie fantasies. They talk all the time about drinking wine on a boat.

            • Maalus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Yeah because it doesn’t cost them anything to say they “do their part” when they make token “commitments”. It’s not because the average person gives a shit. Give them a choice - $5 more an hour, or instantly and forever solve climate change and see how many people would choose climate change.

              People complain about having to sort trash before throwing it out. Saying “most people care about the environment” is extremely naive.

      • Jeffool @lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It gives space to do servers based on specific interests if you want. I’m part of a game development server, and my “Local” tab has people on my server often talking about, and showing, things that are related to game development. And I can still follow anyone from any other Mastodon server too.

        If you’re into video games, film, maybe a specific genre of music, you can have an instance dedicated to that. (It might already exist.) It’s like a virtual neighborhood, or forum. Remember forums? Those were nice. They cultivated a sense of community which made people a little more responsible in their attitudes, it feels like. Maybe that’s just nostalgia, but I like the server I’m on. It’s got friendly people I can talk to without feeling the need to fill my follows with them.

        • Wiz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yes! I’m on a local regional server that is nice. I like that it’s locally owned and operated, and we can talk local news and events.

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Oh so just like Discord, why would I need something new, I already have Discord.

        • babybus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          And blue sky got like 15 millions in two weeks. Look, do you really think that everyone decided to diss Mastodon? All major companies, celebrities, sport teams, you name it? Or maybe there’s a more reasonable explanation why Bluesky?

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Look, do you really think that everyone decided to diss Mastodon? All major companies, celebrities, sport teams, you name it?

            Look that’s what is happening

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Their main business and source of money is a proprietary centralized platform. Mastodon is the opposite.

    • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Because casual mainstream basic folk (non-techie) don’t like the slight legwork you need to do and understand the Fediverse

      I saw an article from Yahoo (Source: The Independent) last week about Bluesky’s current success from Xitter refugees and it also listed other similar groups like Mastedon. What didn’t surprise me is that they said Mastedon is predominantly “techie” which includes the majority of it’s user base as “supernerds” with the site having the “steepest learning curve.” This was an op-ed from an outsider.

      Until Mastedon can appeal to simple minded mainstream basic folk (which is a pretty good size of netizens) it will always be a niche group.

      • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Until fediverse advocates stop thinking of people as simple minded, they will never understand the steps needed to be relevant.

        The main advantage to Bluesky’s architecture is centralized identity and distributed components.

        The centralized identity is key. Unless someone figures out a way to do this in activitypub, the fediverse will remain niche.

  • Modva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    That’s great, I suppose less concentration to a single platform is a better direction.

    Is there less rage and frothing at the mouth on Bluesky? I would imagine whatever ills plague Twitter would also eventually come to Bluesky, because people are there. And people are people. We don’t seem to have a solution to the problem - which is a specific subset of people intent on harm, and allowing them direct and wholesale access to the social fabric.

    So easy nowadays to fabricate rage-inducing and follower-generating bait. No time for truth and no plan to really get there. How long before we see someone take a stab at a ministry of truth?

    • karashta@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The block function is heavily used. Whole block lists get passed around quite frequently. I’ve never really seen much hate on there unless I’m clicking into something obviously heated politically. Other people may have other experiences, but the current culture there is to not engage the hate farmers and just block people instead

      • Ofiuco@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Which is honestly how it should be, feeding the trolls or tolerating them is detrimental to any platform, even engaging with them to correct them is giving them fuel.

        Reporting and blocking is the only way and have always been, I don’t know what changed that people decided tolerating/engaging with them was being the better person.

        • icecreamtaco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          In the real world, you cool down hostility by talking it out. On the internet it’s the opposite, and that approach gives the village idiot a global megaphone to radicalize or enrage others with. I think mass adoption social media is new enough that we’re still figuring out how it should work.

          • stardust@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Isn’t it more in the real world people don’t interact with close to the number of people they do on the internet, and they never encounter or avoid a lot of people which acts like a real world filter or blocklist?

            Internet is like walking in a store and then being flooded with hearing the thoughts of everyone in the store like you’re experiencing a telepathic attack.

          • Ofiuco@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            In the real world, you cool down hostility by talking it out.

            I mean… it depends, not everything can be descalated, dependes on the person, their intentions and the place.

            On the internet it’s the opposite, and that approach gives the village idiot a global megaphone to radicalize or enrage others with.

            Pretty much, people know how to behave or they don’t… and they can learn or not, but we have no reason to tolerate the village idiots.

            I think mass adoption social media is new enough that we’re still figuring out how it should work.

            I remember old forums, there was no tolerance for trolls and you could get punished along the troll for feeding it, so people learned to leave them alone and just report them, good sites/forums were heavily moderated and curated.
            I think it started to go down the drain when moderation/ownership was removed from the users, just like with community servers for multiplayer games, companies care only about their own interests so allowing trolls who cause engagement by bait were more than welcome, they just pretended to moderate the services.
            Nowadays… well reddit punishes mods who actually moderate the subs so that’s a waste of time, the fediverse seems to need to learn to just not tolerate nor engage with trolls… and the users have to learn to just report and block, just like the BlueSky users do so the mods can locate and remove the trolls (either users or servers).
            I think admins/mods must be MUCH less tolerant of possible trolls and not be afraid about curating the content to their liking… it’s their server/community after all.

      • radix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Nuclear block plus a culture of not feeding the trolls means the only toxic accounts I’ve run across are just a day or two old. Block and move on. The experience can only be as negative as each user lets it be.

      • static09@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        This has been my experience too. The community moderation tools on top of the tools available to moderate my own feed are leagues ahead of other platforms. Being able to temporarily block keywords feels really awesome in avoiding dumb shit that can blast through social media.

    • babybus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Is there less rage and frothing at the mouth on Bluesky?

      Yes, but I think that’s temporary. When you have tens of millions of users, that’s inevitable. Right now a lot of people are on their honeymoon periods, but I already see sprouts of negative attitude.