• XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      I think everyone knows it’s ridiculous.

      For some the monarchy is a living museum, they don’t have to like it, they just find it interesting.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        The most expensive museum ever. Just what he’s wearing in that pic has a monetary value of more than the combined wealth of your extended family.

        Imagine how much better the world would be if the wealth and land holdings (a sixth of the surface of the entire planet) belonged to the people in stead of the most privileged family in existence.

        • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          The royal family costs the UK tax payer 77p per year, most people aren’t outraged by that.

          It can be argued that they attract a considerable amount of tourism, people that travel to the UK to see the Tower of London, the King’s guards, Buckingham palace and all the rest of it. There is also the “soft power”, people around the world are for some reason obsessed with the UK’s royal family and it does help with influence whether you’d argue that is for better or worse.

          I understand that the obscene wealth they hold during a cost of living crisis is an image problem to say the least and I don’t defend that. Such obscene wealth is awful no matter who you are and according to the times rich list, there are at least 257 residents in the UK that are more wealthy than the Royals, some of them considerably so.

          For the record, I’m not for or against the UK monarchy, I’m somewhere in-between and see validity in both sides of the argument.