• DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago
    • Boot to usb
    • Mount your root filesystem
    • arch-chroot your mounted root filesystem
    • mount /boot
    • mkinitcpio -p linux

    Steps 1,2 and 3 are the entry way to solve all “unbootable Arch” problems by the way, presuming you know what needs to be changed to fix it of course.

  • FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think I didn’t make it clear enough: My laptop was on the power during the update process, when the power randomly cut out - for the first time in about 6 years, it doesn’t happen often. Of course you can interpret it as user error - but I think it’s reasonable to update my system when plugged into, normally reliable power. The laptop battery is pretty much dead, so it would’ve shut itself down automatically anyway.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      How dead are we talking here? Even on an older laptop a kernel update doesn’t take that long. Should have just kept it going, hoping for the best.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t really get why you couldn’t pick one of your other installed kernels and boot that, but you seem pretty intent on blaming arch and I don’t feel like trying to troubleshoot it, so that’s that I guess.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Any immutable distro, Debian, Ubuntu, all their derivatives, Fedora, all its derivatives, OpenSUSE, Slackware, …
        Basically, 95+% of installed Linux systems would retain the old or a backup kernel during an upgrade.

        • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Any immutable distro, Debian, Ubuntu, all their derivatives

          Debian and Ubuntu are not immutable distributions by default, unless I am mistaken.

  • RootAccess@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Out of curiosity: Which operating system(s) can you shutdown while the kernel is being overwritten? I wouldn’t imagine that as a limitation of Arch Linux specifically.

  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    When I used Arch I updated once and it removed the running kernel and its modules. So when I plugged in a webcam it didn’t work, since the module was gone.

    Not a catastrophe, but it was an off-putting user experience coming from Debian. Arch felt more like a desktop OS, Debian feels more like a server OS to me (updates generally warn/confirm when you need to restart services or the machine).

    To each their own! Having more up to date stuff was a nice perk of running Arch, certainly.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh I love Debian on the desktop! More a comment on the feeling of the OS being very concerned about downtime and stability, with minimal “surprises.” Not a bad thing at all!

  • Undearius@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This got me looking to see if there is any way to have a fallback as I have had something similar happen to me.

    The general advice is to have a liveboot USB around. I even saw that you can have GRUB simply boot from an .iso file on the internal drives, which eliminates the need to keep a USB stick around.

    I haven’t followed the steps yet but I’ll give this a shot because it intrigues me.

    https://www.linuxbabe.com/desktop-linux/boot-from-iso-files-using-grub2-boot-loader

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      When talking about Linux, “stable” usually means “doesn’t have major changes often”, or in other words, “doesn’t have lots of updates that break stuff”. That’s why “Debian stable” is called that. Arch is not that.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      So I’m trying to understand if you think that shutting down an update during regenerating the initramfs indicates that Arch isn’t stable? Because that’s a FAFO move and would crater any non-atomic update distro.