im 100% canadian, I dont live in the US and wondering about your system.

so as i understand your political system, a president can only hold office 2 terms. in Trumps case, he served once already, does that mean he can only serve one more, or is the clock reset and he gets a shot at 8 years?

  • You can only serve 2 terms. Period. Doesn’t matter if there is a gap between the terms. He served one. This is his last time, unless he does exactly what he plans to and eliminates elections to become SUPREME OVERLORD OF AMERICA.

  • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    Short of congress changing the law or a successful coup, neither of which are necessarily off the table, yes these next four years will be Trump’s last in office. Who knows what either party will have to offer in 2028.

  • Sabata@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    The only exception I know to 2 terms and 8 years are getting moved from vice president to president and I think that also has a limit. The problem is the US president is now above the law and no one other than congress can stop him, and his sycophants own congress.

    • figjam@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Iirc if the vice replaces the pres after the halfway mark of the term they can server two full terms.

  • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    Legally he’s only got 2 terms. However as my government teacher explained, the constitution says what the Supreme Court says it says. So who knows what they’ll say about it.

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Being President is an official act of the office of President, the President isn’t accountable for crimes as part of official acts, therefore breaking the law on Presidential term limits by staying President is legal.

  • radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

    Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

    “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice,” doesn’t say consecutively. It would take a HUUUUGE leap of logic to insert that word where it doesn’t exist. I’m sure someone will make the argument, but by the letter and the intent of the law, Trump is done after this term.

    “and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.” If Trump has a heart attack and dies before January 20, 2027, Vance would take over and serve 2+ years as President, meaning he could only be elected once for one four-year term.

    The rest of Section 1 just means anyone who was in office at the time is grandfathered into the old rules (no limits).

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      It would take a HUUUUGE leap of logic

      US Fifth Circuit of Appeals and Supreme Courts: “Hold My Beer”

      For example, if Trump’s Republican Congress gets rid of elections, then this Amendment doesn’t matter.

      • Jay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        They probably won’t get rid of elections… they’ll just have sham elections like Russia has to give the impression of “legitimacy” but I guarantee they’ll be heavily rigged in their favor.

    • SimplyTadpole@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Now I’m curious: if Person A serves two full terms as US president, then Person B (from the same party) runs and chooses A as their vice-president, and then steps down, what would happen? Would A be unable to be picked as B’s Vice President in first place, or would A simply be legally unable to be sworn in as President after B stepped down and the Speaker of the House gets the position instead?

  • james_tiberius@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Correct, this is the last time he can be elected.

    “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.” https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/amendments/amendment-xxii

    • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Unless you change the rules with the help of the supreme court of which you elected several judges. I mean, Xi and Putin did it, why can’t Trump?

      • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        By all means, I’d expect him to try, however, this is a constitutional amendment. The Supreme Court can’t take back an amendment the way they can strike down laws (I.e. by ruling it unconstitutional for whatever reason), because it IS constitutional by definition.

        Thankfully, the Constitution is also very specific about what it takes to amend it further. 2/3 of both chambers of Congress, or 2/3 of state legislatures must vote to just propose an amendment, and then, to pass the amendment, they need 3/4 of the vote. Because the process is enumerated, there’s no legal ambiguity they can use to shape their ruling the way they want. To remove term limits, you must amend the Constitution. To amend the Constitution, you must meet these (intentionally) high thresholds. If A -> then B.

        So, unless Trump is able to woo half of the sitting Democrats, as well as 100% of the Republicans, we’re safe from the system being used to guillotine itself (instead, the system will spend the next 4 years hitting itself in the face with a bat). Now, if Trump wants to seize power outside of the system, that’s a different ball game, and the relative friendliness of judges and Congress is a moot point.

        • Furbag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          The Supreme Court can’t take back an amendment the way they can strike down laws (I.e. by ruling it unconstitutional for whatever reason), because it IS constitutional by definition.

          Yeah, but the problem is that the Supreme Court are also the arbiters of the interpretation of the document, and there’s nothing to suggest that they can’t simply come out and say “Oh, it means two consecutive terms”, which is exactly what Putin does in Russia with their term limits - some stooge takes over for a term and then Putin wins in yet another landslide.

          I mean, the 22nd Amendment is very clean, IMO. “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice” is pretty unambiguous, but I really can’t put anything past this corrupt administration. A coup is probably more likely, but if Trump can somehow get the law on his side he won’t need to, so I’m sure he would prefer that route.

        • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Same happened with Hitler. We all know how that turned out. There are humorous similarities, like addiction to amphetamines and not drinking alcohol.

          People who really want to do harm always find ways to bend the rules and get away with it.

  • Hircon@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    It’s 2 total terms. There’s no “resetting the clock” in that rule. Any attempt to remain in power for a third term would be blatantly unconstitutional.

    That said, there’s a real concern that he’s likely to try anyway, and a non-zero chance that he’d succeed if he manages to fill enough of the government and military with people more loyal to him than to the constitution.

    • Kayday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s worth mentioning that this has only been the case since the 1950’s. FDR was elected four times and died during his final term, after which term limits were added to the constitution in response.

      • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s also worth adding, though, that the convention of only running for at most two terms had existed pretty much since the establishment of the republic (until FDR broke it), when Washington and Jefferson each chose not to run for third terms

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yup, Washington was wildly popular at the time. He easily could have stayed in office indefinitely, as long as nothing horrible happened. But his reasoning was that they had just rebelled against a monarchy, and he didn’t intend to start another one.

  • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    You can only be elected as president twice. You can probably hack the system by getting multiple other presidents to select you as vice president, then resign. If you serve more than 2 years of the term they were elected to, that reduces the number of times you can be elected as president to one.

    The 22nd amendment doesn’t say that someone that serves 3.99 years of another president’s term multiple times can’t still be elected, and it doesn’t say that someone not qualified to be elected as president can’t be elected as vice president, but the 12th amendment might. Either of those could be an interesting legal fight.

    • problematicPanther@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      That’s against the rules though. I think it’s the 13th amendment that says a president who was elected twice can’t be selected as VP.

      • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        The 13th ended slavery. You’re probably thinking of the 12th which says that no person constitutionally ineligible to “be” president can be elected as vice president. Importantly, the 22nd only places limits on being “elected” as president, so it’s not (necessarily) creating a constitutional requirement to “be” president by some other means.

        Like I said, it could be an interesting legal fight if it even came up.